Name: Gordon College
Price range: $

Accountability and discipline serve an important purpose in the growth of the individual and the well-being of the community at Gordon College. Each member of the community has committed to live within the College’s expectations of life and conduct which are included in this handbook. When an individual fails to meet the responsibilities that are inherent in membership in this community, there is a need for accountability. The purpose, therefore, for accountability and discipline at Gordon is to create an opportunity for change and growth in the life of the individual, and to create an environment that is distinctively Christian and conducive to learning.

Accountability

Any discussion of accountability begins, of course, with self-discipline. One of Gordon’s primary goals is to help students become less dependent on rules to govern their behavior and more dependent on their own ability to discern what is right, independent of peer pressure and external props. The highest objectives of self-discipline at Gordon are consistent with the biblical principles that are foundational to our community and are emphasized in the College’s Life and Conduct Statement: “Life within a Christian community must be lived to the glory of God, daily conforming ourselves to the image of Christ and recognizing the Lordship of Christ in every activity." Members of the Gordon community are called to “assume responsibility for their own behavior as it reflects upon their Lord, their community and themselves, particularly in the area of personal freedom, (see Life and Conduct, General Principles). It is with these goals in mind that members of the Gordon community are expected to hold themselves accountable for their own behavior.

When self-discipline breaks down, peer accountability becomes necessary. Members of the Gordon community are expected to share responsibility for each other’s growth, to willingly express concern and to caringly confront one another. This type of accountability is a necessary element of responsible biblical relationships in our community, including those among students, faculty and staff. Gordon’s expectations for life and conduct call us to become a community where our actions “are not solely a private matter.” We are called to “be concerned about the welfare of other individuals within the community and of the community as a whole” (see General Principles). This level of concern and accountability is essential to produce the support and impetus that enables an individual to change inappropriate behavior and to effect significant growth in a person’s life and in the life of the community. Because of this strong belief in peer accountability, Gordon students who assist or encourage other students to violate the behavioral standards of the community also may be subject to the disciplinary action outlined below.

Failure to comply with the directions of College officials or being uncooperative or disrespectful to College officials in the performance of their duties will not be tolerated. This includes, but is not limited to, Resident Directors, Resident Advisors, Gordon Police officers and any faculty or staff member.

Community Accountability and Discipline

If behavioral change does not occur as a result of peer accountability and behavior continues that is inappropriate to community life at Gordon, community accountability will take place. Community accountability entails confrontation from a Resident Assistant (RA), Resident Director, Associate Dean, or the Dean of Students. It is desirable that this accountability occurs at the level closest to the infraction. Consequently, inappropriate behavior may first be confronted by the RA. In instances where an RA’s involvement does not bring the appropriate change in behavior, the RA will take the situation to the Resident Director. Issues unresolved at that level may be taken to the Office of Student Life.

At any point in the process of community accountability, a disciplinary response may occur. RAs and Resident Directors may administer some disciplinary sanctions. Certain behaviors that have been judged by the community to be of a more serious nature may be confronted by an RA, Resident Director, Associate Dean, or Dean of Students. However, the disciplinary response to these more serious behaviors will be determined by a senior student life administrator.

Conduct Amnesty Policy

As a way of supporting and encouraging students to live healthy and faithful lives, Gordon College has developed an approach to encourage godly living and reconciliation to the community standards. Students who have engaged in behaviors outside the Life and Conduct Statement, and who are seeking to change those behaviors, will have the opportunity to access our on-campus support network rather than adhere to the routine disciplinary process. Issues of special concern may include such things as use of illegal drugs, abuse of alcohol, use of pornography, or inappropriate sexual behaviors. Requests must precede any disciplinary confrontation resulting from behaviors contrary to the Life and Conduct Statement. Students who seek help will be given supportive, appropriate, and confidential assistance for accountability from caring staff.

When a student reaches out to a staff member for amnesty under this policy, the staff member will report it to the Student Care and Conduct Coordinator. The Student Care and Conduct Coordinator or their designee will reach out to the student to set up a meeting to discuss a support plan for the student. Attendance at this meeting and consistent engagement with the agreed-upon support plan are necessary to the student avoiding any disciplinary consequences. Students who have applied for amnesty but consistently demonstrate an unwillingness to engage with the support structure may face standard disciplinary consequences for their behavior.

Please contact the Office of Student Life at extension 4263 or [email protected] for more information.

Disciplinary Procedures

Resident Directors, the Associate Dean of Residence and Community Life, and the Student Care and Conduct Coordinator are considered primary conduct officers and hear student conduct cases according to the severity of the case. Under the discretion of Student Life, a larger panel comprised of pre-selected faculty and staff may be assembled to assist the hearing of cases for any reason, under the direction of the Associate Dean of Residence and Community Life or the Student Care and Conduct Coordinator.

For procedures related to sexual misconduct (including sexual harassment and sexual assault), please see the Handbook's section on Nondiscrimination & Protection Policies, Title IX as well as the College's website on sexual misconduct. For procedures related to Academic Dishonesty, see Academic Policies and Academic Dishonesty. All records and outcomes of cases are recorded by the supervising administrator.

As a Christian institution, Gordon is committed to exemplifying grace and truth in the disciplinary process. Violations of school policy will be taken seriously. God's love and care for every student involved in a situation will also be taken seriously.

A student reportedly involved in misconduct shall be informed of the following assurances and responsibilities:

Assurances

To have counsel of an advisor during a conduct hearing.
To receive reasonable due process. Reasonable due process includes notice of specific charges and appropriate time to prepare for a conduct hearing.
To request a private conduct hearing when more than one student is involved in the reported misconduct.
To receive the decision of a conduct hearing in writing.
To appeal a decision within two (2) business days of written notification of the decision (see appeals process for specific guidelines).
To request that up to two (2) witnesses be invited to the conduct hearing to speak on his/her behalf in the disciplinary proceedings.
To supply in writing one (1) letter of character reference. This letter should be supplied before or at the time of the conduct hearing.
The option to present in writing the names of other people who have pertinent information regarding the particular conduct issue.

Responsibilities

To be truthful and respectful in all student conduct proceedings. Note that lying in the disciplinary process is also a violation of the life and conduct statement and may result in greater consequences for a student in the process.
To be open to processing and learning from their experience.

Definition of Parties and Roles

Reporting Party: A person who has made the College aware of any alleged violation of college policy as outlined in the student handbook.

Complainant: A person who has filed a complaint reporting that they have been the victim of misconduct under college policy as outlined in the student handbook. In cases where the reporting party is not a victim of the misconduct, the College may operate as the complainant through the disciplinary process.

Respondent: A person who has been reported to be the perpetrator of misconduct under college policy as outlined in the student handbook.

Witness: A person who has additional direct knowledge of the alleged misconduct relevant to the investigation and disciplinary process but is not a reporting party, complainant or respondent in the process. Witnesses can be invited to a hearing by either the College or by the respondent, but are not obligated to attend if they do not wish to.

Advisor: A person chosen by any party to accompany the party to meetings throughout the process. The advisor may not speak on behalf of the party but can offer advice and provide support to the party. Parties involved in the hearing in another role defined above or parties operating as legal counsel are not eligible to serve as an advisor.

Preliminary Procedures

Any member of the Gordon community may report information regarding an alleged incident of misconduct to staff members in the Office of Student Life.

The Office of Student Life will assume responsibility for the investigation of the incident, and the matter will be discussed with the respondent.
The initial investigation involves an interview with Student Life staff. Conduct interviews last between 15 and 40 minutes and are an opportunity for a student to provide information regarding the alleged incident. The conduct officer will first remind the student of their rights and responsibilities, describe relevant details from the report, and ask the student questions aimed at giving additional information for the conduct officer to consider as they seek to determine whether a violation occurred.
The Associate Dean of Residence and Community Life or their designee will decide whether to dismiss the matter without action or refer the matter for further resolution. Resolution options are discussed below.

Resolution Options

Informal Resolution

If both the complainant and respondent are amenable to a resolution process that does not include a formal hearing, the Associate Dean of Residence and Community Life or their designee may facilitate an informal agreement between the parties. Examples of an informal resolution include supportive measures, mediation or restorative practices, or any other negotiated resolution acceptable to both parties and the college official.

An informal resolution requires ongoing consent from all parties involved throughout the process. If at any point during the process of informal resolution, a party involved in the resolution process (complainant, respondent, or college official) determines that an informal resolution is not the best course of action, the matter shall be referred to the formal resolution process outlined below.

Formal Resolution (Hearing Procedures)

If a matter cannot be resolved through informal resolution, the Student Care and Conduct Coordinator may hear the case and impose sanctions.

Other staff members of the Office of Student Life or the College may also participate as hearing officers depending on the nature and location of the violation.
When a hearing is to be held, all parties shall be notified of the date, time and place of the hearing.
Respondents have the opportunity to plead "responsible" or "not responsible" for each of the charges brought forward by the complainant. "Responsible" pleas will typically lead to more informal conversations than "not responsible" pleas.
Evidence will be presented to the hearing officer(s) verbally, in writing or through testimony at the hearing. The Standard of Proof will be the Preponderance of the Evidence. This means that such evidence, when considered and compared with that opposed to it, has more convincing force and produces in the minds of those hearing the evidence the belief that the alleged misconduct more likely occurred than not.
In cases where the college operates as the complainant, the hearing is designed to be a discussion between the respondent and those hearing the case, which facilitates redemptive progress while appropriately addressing the issue at hand.
In cases where the college is adjudicating a matter between a complainant and respondent, the hearing is designed to be a more formal proceeding, which protects the parties involved and ensures due process in potentially contentious environments.
Hearings shall be open only to the hearing officer(s), the respondent, the complainant, advisors, and witnesses. At a minimum, the hearing officer(s), respondent, and complainant (if applicable) are required to attend the hearing. If the respondent chooses not to attend the hearing, the hearing may still be conducted by the hearing officer(s) present. Lawyers representing any party are specifically prohibited from attending the hearing.
Witnesses are not required to attend the hearing and may submit a written statement or other form of testimony in lieu of appearing at the hearing. Witnesses who choose to appear may be present only while giving testimony. Witnesses can be invited to a hearing by either the school or by the respondent, but are not obligated to attend.
The respondent may question the complainant and all witnesses present at the hearing, and must also submit to being questioned by the complainant. The complainant may also question all witnesses present at the hearing. Advisors may not question witnesses on behalf of the complainant or respondent. If the College deems it necessary, it may direct that questioning be managed by the hearing officer(s), rather than having the parties address each other directly.
The hearing officer(s) shall raise questions pertinent to the alleged incident, the attitude of the respondent and his/her previous behavior.
After the hearing in concluded, the hearing officer(s) shall discuss the issues and reach a decision. A simple majority will determine whether the preponderance of the evidence supports the belief that the alleged misconduct more likely occurred than not.

Report of Decision

The hearing officer(s) shall prepare a summary of the hearing, including the decision.
The hearing officer(s) shall report the decision and the sanctions to the respondent.

Appeal of Decision

If the respondent believes there is substantial evidence that the decision rendered was arbitrary or capricious, or has new evidence with a bearing on the case, he/she may appeal in writing to the Associate Dean of Residence and Community Life if the Associate Dean has not been involved in the hearing. If the Associate Dean of Residence and Community Life was involved, the Dean of Students will serve as the appeals officer.
After a review of the record of the hearing and any additional evidence presented by the respondent, the hearing outcome shall be reversed or affirmed by the appeals officer.

Automatic Appeal

In the case of a suspension of one term or longer, or expulsion, an appeal will be automatically available. If the student elects to appeal such a sanction, he/she must follow the normal appeal process.

Impositions of Sanctions Prior to a Hearing

The College may, subject to a subsequent hearing, impose immediate sanctions against a student including suspension if, in the sole opinion of the Dean of Students, the student’s continued presence on the campus might 1) create a danger of physical or mental harm to the student or another person or 2) disrupt the educational process of the College.
A hearing subsequent to the imposition of immediate sanctions must be conducted in accordance with the procedures outlined above.

Disciplinary Sanctions

There are a variety of sanctions that may be invoked as disciplinary responses. They include: fines, letters of contract, educational programs, disciplinary probation, community service hours, restriction of housing and other privileges, leaves of absence and suspension. Suspensions may be administered only in disciplinary hearings.

Suspension normally follows continued violations of the College’s policies, compromises to personal integrity, disruptions to community life, and threats to the health and safety of others. Although suspension is normally reserved for multiple infractions, it can be used after a first offense if the violation is considered particularly egregious or involves concerns over the health and safety of others.

Suspension is the separation of the student from the College for a full academic semester or more. Returning to the College after suspension is conditional upon application and readmission to Gordon; and a student’s readmission is at the discretion of the College. Parents of dependent students are notified and a record is kept in the student’s file. No refunds are made.

Expulsion is a permanent suspension and will only be used as a last resort.

Procedures for Mandatory Leave of Absence

Gordon College offers a range of support services to address the medical and psychological needs of students within the context of the campus community. At times, students may experience health needs requiring a level of care that exceeds what the College can appropriately provide. In such cases, students may decide to take a voluntary leave of absence and, when applicable, file a tuition insurance claim for the semester.

Gordon College may initiate a mandatory leave of absence when:

a student exhibits behavior that appears to disrupt the academic process or legitimate activities of members of the College community; or,
behavior that presents a danger to the life, health, and safety of other members of the College community; or,
in situations where a student is unable or unwilling to cooperate with a recommended evaluation or treatment procedure, and the student does not want to take a voluntary leave of absence.
This policy may also apply to any student returning from a hospital confinement who needs a level of care that exceeds what the College can appropriately provide.

When the College has evidence of the behavioral issues listed above, a medical/psychological evaluation may be required. The results of the evaluation will be provided to the Associate Dean of Residence and Community Life. In addition, the Dean of Students or their designee may consult with the student about his/her behavior and, to the extent permitted by law, may also notify the student’s parent, guardian, or another appropriate adult. The Dean of Students will make the final decision regarding approval of a mandatory leave of absence. The student has the right to be informed of all pertinent information leading to the leave of absence decision. The length of the leave of absence will be determined on a case-by-case basis, and the conditions under which a student may return to the College will be identified at the time of the leave of absence.

Student Disciplinary Procedures